Advantages and Disadvantages of Traditional Budgeting Approach

Budgeting is a cornerstone of financial planning in businesses. The traditional budgeting approach, with its roots in historical accounting practices, has been a mainstay in the corporate world. However, this method has faced criticism, particularly from proponents of more dynamic budgeting methods like Beyond Budgeting.

In this article, we delve into the pros and cons of the traditional budgeting approach, offering insights for companies considering their financial planning strategies.

Read more: Digital Transformation in Finance and The Changing Role of CFOs

One of the primary criticisms of traditional budgeting is its inefficiency. This inefficiency stems from:

• Tedious data entry: Spreadsheet reliance can result in data inaccuracies.
• Version Control Issues: Managing multiple versions of budgets creates confusion.
• Low Change Responsiveness: Annual budget cycles often render budgets obsolete shortly after their creation.

Being unable to access accurate, real-time budgets can lead to significant delays and reduced adaptability to change.

Read more: 7 Worst Financial Fiascos Caused by Excel errors

Back to the top

Traditional budgeting can inadvertently promote negative behaviours. It often leads to:

• “Gaming” and Unprofessional Attitudes: Encouraging managers to manipulate numbers to meet budgetary targets.
• Bureaucracy and Vertical Control: Creating a rigid structure that devalues employee contribution.
• Reinforcement of Departmental Barriers: Hindering knowledge sharing and collaboration.
  

Back to the top

Disconnection from strategic plan

As managers become fixated on meeting budget targets, they can lose sight of the strategic importance of budgeting. The traditional budgeting process tends to prioritise cost reduction over value creation, which can result in strategic initiatives being unjustly deprioritised.

This narrow focus on cost reduction can hinder a company's ability to innovate and adapt to changing market conditions. By solely concentrating on cutting expenses, managers may miss out on opportunities to invest in new technologies, develop new products, or enter new markets. This can ultimately limit the company's long-term growth potential.

Read more: How AstraZeneca Cuts Costs by Automating Their Expense Management

Back to the top

Advantages of traditional budgeting

Even though the traditional budgeting system has several shortcomings, it is still considered an indispensable process for many businesses. Below are reasons why companies continue to rely on this method.

It provides a framework for control

Traditional budgeting serves as a coordination tool for a company's financial activities by setting financial objectives, allocating resources based on historical data and projected trends, and creating a reference point for managing activities with stability.

This framework of control helps companies align their financial activities with the overall goals.

Back to the top

It is part of organisational culture

Budgeting has been a longstanding practice in many companies, ingrained in their organisational culture. It is deeply rooted in historical accounting practices and has become a fundamental method of operating.

As such, eliminating traditional budgeting entirely can be a risky decision, as it may disrupt well-established processes and norms.

Back to the top

It accommodates the need to decentralise

Some organisations, particularly banks and financial institutions, recognise the benefits of decentralisation while still maintaining standard operating procedures.

Traditional budgeting, with its use of budget cost centres, allows managers the freedom to run their operations within set parameters. It strikes a balance between decentralisation and maintaining control over financial activities.

Find out: What to look for in a planning and budgeting solution

Back to the top

Navigating the Challenges: Modern Solutions

Balancing Tradition with Innovation

All in all, while traditional budgeting has its place, companies nowadays must recognise its limitations and embrace modern solutions.

The ideal approach is to blend traditional practices with innovative, dynamic methods. This ensures a comprehensive, responsive, and strategic financial planning process that can adapt to the ever-changing business landscape.

By finding the right balance between tradition and innovation, companies can position themselves for success in the modern business world.

Back to the top